Developing Quadcopter Using Pixhawk 2.4.8 for Enhancing Atmospheric Physics Learning

Authors

  • Wayan Suparta Naresuan University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Engineering,

Abstract

Implemented project-based learning using drones is more fun and the concepts delivered are easily understood by students. This research has built a DIY drone using an F450 quadcopter to improve the quality of the learning process such as basic concepts of atmospheric physics. The main system of the drone is a Pixhawk 2.4.8 flight controller where the system is set up via Mission Planner to work on autopilot. For atmospheric physics learning, atmospheric data such as temperature, relative humidity, and air pressure is collected using BME280 sensors on the drone and on the ground. The sensor is controlled by Arduino Uno and a data logger has also been developed to store data into a Micro SD card for post hoc analysis. Once the drone is tested for flight stability, it can be applied to measure atmospheric parameters including flight altitude and precipitable water vapor. With this development, the system can be utilized to quantitatively show the relationship between atmospheric parameters and ultimately can predict other related parameters as well as able to provide interpretation of measurement results as evidence of improved understanding.

References

Ryan, G.; Toohey, S.; Hughes, C. The purpose, value and structure of the practicum in higher education: A literature review. High. Educ. 1996, 31, 355–377.

Bowman,R. Electrical engineering freshmen practicum. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 2003.

Leal-Rodríguez, A.L.; Gema Albort-Morant, G. Promoting innovative experiential learning practices to improve academic performance: Empirical evidence from a Spanish Business School. J. Innov. Knowl. 2019, 4, 97-103.

Kondratjew, H.; Kahrens, M. (2019), "Leveraging experiential learning training through spaced learning", Journal of Work-Applied Management 2018, 11, 30-52.

Maghazei, O.; Netland, T. Drones in manufacturing: exploring opportunities for research and practice. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2020, 31, 1237-1259.

Bai, O.; Chu, H.; Liu, H.; Hui, G. Drones in education: A critical review, Turkish J. Comput. Math. Educ. 2021, 12, 1722-1727.

Sattar, F.; Tamatea, L.; Nawaz, M. Droning the pedagogy: Future prospect of teaching and learning. Int. J. Educ. Pedagog. Sci. 2017, 11, 1632-1637.

Jordan, B. R. A bird’s-eye view of geology: The use of micro drones/UAVs in geologic fieldwork and education. GSA today 2015, 25, 50-52.

Fung, F. M.; Watts, S. The Application of Drones in Chemical Education for Analytical Environmental Chemistry. In Teaching and the Internet: The Application of Web Apps, Networking, and Online Tech for Chemistry Education 2017, 155-169.

Joyce, K. E.; Meiklejohn, N.; Mead, P.C. Using Minidrones to Teach Geospatial Technology Fundamentals. Drones 2020, 4, 57.

Ahmed, H.O.K. Towards application of drone- based GeoSTEM education: Teacher educators’ readiness (attitudes, competencies, and obstacles). Educ. Inf. Technol. 2021, 26, 4379–4400.

Yepes, I.; Barone, D.A.C.; Porciuncula, C.M.D. Use of Drones as Pedagogical Technology in STEM Disciplines. Inform. Educ. 2021.

Hall, O.; Wahab, I. The use of drones in the spatial social sciences. Drones 2021, 5,112.

Ng, W.S.; Cheng, G. Integrating drone technology in STEM education: A case study to assess teachers’ readiness and training needs. Issues Informing Sci. Inf. Technol. 2019, 16, 61-70.

Zhang, Y.; Dong, T.; Liu, Y. Design of meteorological element detection platform for atmospheric boundary layer based on UAV. Int. J. Aerosp. Eng. 2017, 1831676.

Varentsov, M.I.; Artamonov, A.Y.; Pashkin, A.D.; Repina, I.A. Experience in the quadcopter-based meteorological observations in the atmospheric boundary layer. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 231, 012053.

Singhal, G.; Bansod, B.; Mathew, L. Unmanned Aerial Vehicle classification, Applications and challenges: A Review. Preprints 2018.

Apeland, D.; Pavlou, T.; Hemmingsen. Suitability Analysis of Implementing a Fuel Cell on a Multirotor Drone. J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag. 2020, 12, e3220.

Suparta, W.; Warsita, A.; Ircham. A low-cost development of automatic weather station based on Arduino for monitoring precipitable water vapor. Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2021, 24, 744-753.

Suparta, W. The use of GPS meteorology for climate change detection. 2012 International Conference on Green and Ubiquitous Technology 2012, pp. 71-73.

Suparta, W.; Alhasa, K.M. Modeling of precipitable water vapor using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system in the absence of the GPS network. J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim. 2016, 552283-2300.

ArduPilot Dev Team, Pixhawk Overview, https://ardupilot.org/copter/docs/common-pixhawk-overview.html [Accessed 23 July 2021]

Veyna, U.; Garcia-Nieto, S.; Simarro, R.; Salcedo, J.V. Quadcopters testing platform for educational environments, Sensors 2021, 21, 4134.

ArduPilot, Firmware site, path: /Tools/MissionPlanner, https://firmware.ardupilot.org/Tools/MissionPlanner/ [Accessed 23 March 2021]

World Meteorological Organization (WMO)/CIMO/ET-Stand-1/Doc. 10 (20.XI.2012), https://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/www/IMOP/meetings/SI/ET-Stand-1/Doc-10_Pressure-red.pdf.

Jardine, W.G. Determination of altitude, In: van de Plassche O. (eds), Sea-Level Research. Sea-Level Research. Springer, Dordrecht, 1986, pp. 569-590

Delmar-Morgan, E. The Beaufort Scale. Journal of Navigation 1959, 12, 100-102.

Gao, M.; Hugenholtz, C.H.; Fox, T.A.; Kucharczyk, M.; Barchyn, T.E.; Nesbit, P.R. Weather constraints on global drone flyability. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12092.

Additional Files

Published

2025-05-30

Issue

Section

Applications